Skip to content
HRM Framework 2.0 , home

Key termsVersion 2.0

Key terms

The core ideas first, one line each. All 92 terms follow, A to Z.

Start here

  1. Level 1 Signal 137 in this version
  2. Level 2 Cohort 24 in this version
  3. Level 3 Sequence 11 in this version
  4. Level 4 Breach scenario 10 in this version
Each level is made of the one before it. Every signal sits in one risk domain and one dimension, and is about one subject.
Signal 137
One observable unit of evidence about one subject from one source: a real phish delivered, a simulated link clicked, a privileged role held.
Cohort 24
Two or three signals that describe the same subject at once, named as a population a program can count, trend and act on.
Sequence 11
An ordered run of signals across MITRE ATT&CK tactics inside a detection window, from first exposure to compromise evidence.
Breach scenario 10
The kind of breach the evidence beneath it points toward, each anchored to a Verizon DBIR or VERIS pattern or an FBI IC3 category.
Indicator 481
A detailed observation in the indicator library, beneath the signals. Only signals carry source and standards mappings.
Risk domain 9
One of 9 areas of human risk, from social engineering to readiness and response. Every signal belongs to one.
Dimension
Every signal answers one of 3 questions.
  • Threat What reaches a person?
  • Access What could they expose?
  • Behavior What do they do under pressure?
Subject
Who or what a signal is about: person, AI agent, vendor and organization.
  • Person A human member of the workforce with an identity in the directory: employees, contractors and contingent workers.
  • AI agent A non-human workforce member: an AI agent or service identity with its own credentials, scopes and logs, and a human owner who approves, scopes and retires it.
  • Vendor A third party whose product, service or integration the organization uses.
  • Organization The organization as a whole.
Maturity level 5
One of five levels in the Human Risk Management Maturity Model: Comply, Observe, Prioritize, Orchestrate and Preempt, each an active verb for what the program does with risk.
Practice 6
One capability a program performs, scored on its own: See, Understand, Act, Prove, Govern and Culture.

All terms, A to Z

A

  • HRM-INT-17Interventions

    A response that removes or narrows an entitlement because a person's risk rose or the entitlement went unused. It reduces the Access dimension directly.

    Also: entitlement removal, deprovisioning, privilege reduction

    Full entry: Access revocation
  • HRM-INT-15Interventions

    A security control whose strength changes with a person's measured risk: stricter authentication, narrower access or tighter data rules for high-risk cohorts, relaxed again as risk falls.

    Also: conditional policy, conditional access, risk-based control, adaptive security control

    Full entry: Adaptive control
  • HRM-TECH-12Technology

    The register of AI agents and service identities with their owner, scopes, logging state and retirement date. It makes agents subjects of the taxonomy.

    Also: agent registry, non-human identity inventory, service account inventory

    Full entry: AI agent inventory
  • HRM-GOV-10Governance

    The record an auditor can inspect for each claim the program makes: the signal definition, the source event, the computation and the time it ran. Every maturity criterion lists the evidence to ask for.

    Also: evidence, proof, audit trail

    Full entry: Audit evidence
  • HRM-INT-19Interventions

    An intervention executed by a playbook or an agent without a person in the loop, inside limits the program sets. Every run is logged with its trigger and effect.

    Also: automated remediation, autonomous response, agentic remediation

    Full entry: Automated response
  • HRM-MEAS-16Measurement

    The estimated cost of incidents that did not occur because measured risk fell, computed from incident lift, the organization’s own incident costs and the change in exposed population. Assumptions are published with the number.

    Also: risk-adjusted savings, loss avoidance, return on risk reduction

    Full entry: Avoided loss
  • HRM-INT-02Interventions

    The baseline cybersecurity training delivered to all personnel on a fixed cadence, at hire and at least annually. It builds security awareness and yields a completion rate.

    Also: literacy training, all-user training, general training, compliance training, security awareness training

    Full entry: Awareness training

B

  • HRM-INT-04Interventions

    A short training item assigned automatically when a specific risky behavior signal fires, delivered within hours and tied to that behavior. The share of such content is a program metric.

    Also: triggered training, remedial training, event-driven training

    Full entry: Behavior-triggered training
  • HRM-GOV-04Governance

    A quarterly report to the board or risk committee of a few key risk indicators against appetite, the trend of exposed populations and the avoided loss claimed, with the method behind each number.

    Also: executive reporting, board pack, board metrics

    Full entry: Board reporting
  • HRM-TECH-11Technology

    A service that reports credentials, sessions and personal data about the workforce found in breach dumps, infostealer logs and dark-web markets. Each hit is a Threat signal for the exposed person.

    Also: dark web monitoring, credential exposure feed, infostealer feed

    Full entry: Breach exposure feed

C

  • HRM-MEAS-01Measurement

    The share of delivered simulated lures that were clicked, opened or acted on in a period. The equivalent for real phishing is the real phishing click rate, measured from email security telemetry.

    Also: simulation click rate, failure rate, simulation failure rate, click-through rate

    Full entry: Click rate
  • HRM-MEAS-13Measurement

    The smallest number of records a benchmark group needs before an aggregate is shown: 25. Groups below the minimum show no number, which protects the people in them.

    Also: minimum group size, suppression threshold, k-anonymity threshold

    Full entry: Cohort minimum
  • HRM-MEAS-20Measurement

    The difference, in points, between how able people rate themselves and how they perform in simulations and drills. A large gap marks overconfident cohorts.

    Also: overconfidence gap, self-assessment gap

    Full entry: Confidence-ability gap
  • HRM-TECH-03Technology

    An integration that pulls events from one data source into the platform on a schedule and maps them to signals. A connector that falls silent for seven days marks its signals unknown.

    Also: integration, data connector, source integration

    Full entry: Connector
  • HRM-MEAS-10Measurement

    The share of signals, cohorts and sequences a program can compute from its connected sources, and the share of the workforce each measure reaches. Coverage is reported before any risk number.

    Also: data coverage, signal coverage, program reach

    Full entry: Coverage
  • HRM-CON-03Constructs

    A cohort class where Threat, Access and Behavior signals all fire on one person. The program treats members as its first priority for intervention and control change.

    Also: critical triad, T+A+B cohort

    Full entry: Critical cohort
  • HRM-INT-21Interventions

    A short, recurring survey that measures attitudes, confidence, perceived friction and help-seeking across the workforce. Participation and the answers are Security culture signals.

    Also: pulse survey, culture survey, sentiment survey

    Full entry: Culture pulse survey

D

  • HRM-INT-07Interventions

    A multichannel simulation that uses synthetic voice or video of a known person to test whether staff verify identity before acting on a request.

    Also: AI-powered social engineering simulation, synthetic media simulation

    Full entry: Deepfake simulation
  • HRM-CON-07Constructs

    The time span inside which the steps of a sequence must occur for the sequence to count. Each sequence sets its own window, from 24 hours to 95 days.

    Also: sequence window, time window

    Full entry: Detection window
  • HRM-CON-08Constructs

    How long a signal stays active after it fires: Threat 90 days, simulated behavior 180 days, hygiene behavior 90 days, real interaction 30 days, compromise evidence 14 days, Access standing. A person's stage is the furthest stage any active signal sets.

    Also: signal decay, signal lifetime, decay window, dwell

    Full entry: Dwell window

E

  • HRM-TECH-06Technology

    The system that filters inbound mail and records what reached each inbox: phishing delivered, impersonation attempts, user reports and outbound malicious mail. It is the main Threat source for social engineering.

    Also: secure email gateway, SEG, email security

    Full entry: Email security gateway
  • HRM-TECH-07Technology

    The agent on a device that detects malware, blocks malicious destinations and records tampering. Its events, joined to the device owner, give the Endpoint and device signals.

    Also: EDR, endpoint protection, XDR

    Full entry: Endpoint detection and response
  • HRM-INT-24Interventions

    A periodic review of every active policy exception against its approved end date and reason. Exceptions past expiry are a readiness metric.

    Also: exception recertification, waiver review

    Full entry: Exception review

G

  • HRM-MEAS-11Measurement

    A letter from A to F for one risk domain, computed from its headline metrics against published bands. Grades describe results; maturity levels describe capability.

    Also: domain grade, scorecard grade, letter grade

    Full entry: Grade

H

  • HRM-INT-23Interventions

    A standing way for teams to ask security for help before they buy, build or connect something. Request volume is a culture metric that rises as trust grows.

    Also: security help desk, business engagement channel, ask-security channel

    Full entry: Help-before-you-build channel
  • HRM-CON-02Constructs

    A cohort class that joins a risky Behavior signal with an Access signal: a person whose compromise would expose privileged systems, sensitive data or payment authority.

    Also: B+A cohort, privileged risky users

    Full entry: High-impact cohort
  • HRM-GOV-02Governance

    A written agreement between security and human resources on which people data the program may use, for what purpose and for how long. It covers roles, start and leave dates, managers and location.

    Also: HR data agreement, people data agreement

    Full entry: HR data-use agreement
  • HRM-MEAS-12Measurement

    The Human Risk Management Framework dataset of assessment results, grouped by role, company size band, industry and region, used to compare a program with its peers. No aggregate is shown for a group under 25 records.

    Also: benchmark, peer comparison, peer benchmark

    Full entry: HRM Benchmark
  • HRM-MEAS-24Measurement

    The share of breaches in the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report where a person was a gating factor in one of the actions: 60% in the 2025 report and 62% in the 2026 report. Always state the year.

    Also: human element, human involvement rate

    Full entry: Human element share
  • HRM-CORE-01Core concepts

    The likelihood and impact of a security loss that a person's action or inaction gates. It combines the threats that reach a person, the access the person holds and the behaviors the person shows.

    Also: human cyber risk, people risk, human factor, human layer, workforce risk, eighth layer

    Full entry: Human risk
  • HRM-TECH-02Technology

    The screen where an analyst sees people and cohorts ranked by risk, the signals behind each number and the interventions in flight. It reads from the platform and adds no new data.

    Also: risk dashboard, risk explorer, risk command center

    Full entry: Human risk console
  • HRM-CORE-02Core concepts

    The discipline that measures human risk per person, intervenes with training, nudges and control changes based on that risk, equips the workforce to defend itself and builds a security culture. Forrester named the market in 2024.

    Also: HRM, human cyber risk management, workforce risk management

    Full entry: Human risk management
  • HRM-CORE-03Core concepts

    An open framework, version 2.0, under CC BY 4.0, with three parts: the HRM Taxonomy, the HRM Maturity Model and the HRM Maturity Assessment. The HRM Benchmark dataset and the annual State of Human Risk report sit beside it.

    Also: HRM Framework, Human Risk Framework 2.0, human risk taxonomy, HRM Taxonomy, HRM Maturity Model

    Full entry: Human Risk Management Framework
  • HRM-TECH-01Technology

    Software that connects to the sources, computes signals, cohorts, sequences and scores per subject, runs interventions and playbooks, and reports coverage, grades and key risk indicators. The taxonomy defines what it must compute and names no product.

    Also: HRM platform, human risk platform, SBCP platform, secure behavior management platform

    Full entry: Human risk management platform
  • HRM-GOV-01Governance

    The named role accountable for human risk and its key risk indicators. Ownership moves from the awareness lead to the CISO with IT, HR and Finance, and at the Preempt level to a board-level owner.

    Also: program ownership, accountable executive, risk owner

    Full entry: Human risk ownership
  • HRM-MEAS-23Measurement

    Turning threat, access and behavior evidence into a likelihood and impact estimate per subject. The method, inputs and window are published so a second analyst can reproduce the number.

    Also: risk scoring, risk modeling, risk quantification

    Full entry: Human risk quantification
  • HRM-CORE-05Core concepts

    A per-person score that summarizes one subject’s human risk from threat, access and behavior evidence over a window. The scale is set by the program or the tool; the taxonomy states the inputs and the window beside any score.

    Also: risk score, risk rating, vigilance score, risk index

    Full entry: Human risk score

I

  • HRM-TECH-09Technology

    The system of record for entitlements, privileged access and recertification. It supplies the Access dimension, who holds what, since when and last used, and executes access revocation.

    Also: IGA, PAM, entitlement management, access governance

    Full entry: Identity governance and administration
  • HRM-TECH-05Technology

    The system that authenticates people and agents and issues sessions. It supplies sign-in, MFA method and anomaly telemetry and executes step-up authentication.

    Also: IdP, SSO, identity platform

    Full entry: Identity provider
  • HRM-GOV-09Governance

    One of three CIS Controls v8.1 enterprise profiles, IG1, IG2 and IG3, that select which safeguards apply. Control 14 has 8 of 9 safeguards at IG1; role-specific training (14.9) starts at IG2.

    Also: IG, CIS implementation group

    Full entry: Implementation group
  • HRM-MEAS-15Measurement

    How much more often a real incident follows a pattern, a cohort or a sequence, than the base rate across the workforce. Lift above 1 shows the pattern matters in this organization.

    Also: lift, pattern lift, predictive lift

    Full entry: Incident lift
  • HRM-GOV-12Governance

    The risk that a person with legitimate access misuses it on purpose. The taxonomy treats insider risk as a sibling discipline: its insider and privilege misuse breach scenario shares signals, while intent is handled by a separate program.

    Also: insider threat, malicious insider, privilege misuse

    Full entry: Insider risk
  • HRM-INT-01Interventions

    An action a program takes on a person, cohort or control because of measured risk: training, a nudge, coaching, a simulation, a control change. Interventions are logged so their effect can be measured.

    Also: remediation, response, action

    Full entry: Intervention

J

  • HRM-INT-09Interventions

    Coaching delivered inside the workflow seconds after a risky action, explaining what happened and the safer step. It differs from a nudge by being tied to a specific detected event.

    Also: real-time coaching, in-the-moment coaching, triggered coaching

    Full entry: Just-in-time coaching

K

  • HRM-MEAS-17Measurement

    A metric with a threshold agreed by leadership that signals when human risk exceeds appetite. Key risk indicators are few, trended and reported to the board.

    Also: KRI, board metric, risk indicator

    Full entry: Key risk indicator

L

  • HRM-GOV-14Governance

    The managed set of awareness, role-based and reinforcement activities, with a strategic plan, an owner and a budget, that an organization runs to reduce risk through education. NIST calls the federal version a Cybersecurity and Privacy Learning Program.

    Also: CPLP, training program, curriculum, security awareness program

    Full entry: Learning program

M

  • HRM-MEAS-21Measurement

    One of five levels in the Human Risk Management Maturity Model: Comply, Observe, Prioritize, Orchestrate and Preempt, each an active verb for what the program does with risk. Each practice is scored on the same five levels.

    Also: level, tier, program maturity

    Full entry: Maturity level
  • HRM-INT-10Interventions

    Training delivered in units of a few minutes, each on one behavior, spaced over time. The unit is small enough to attach to a nudge or a simulation result.

    Also: micro-training, bite-sized training, spaced learning

    Full entry: Microlearning
  • HRM-INT-06Interventions

    A simulation delivered by voice, SMS, QR code, collaboration chat or video. In the 2026 DBIR the median click rate in voice and text-message simulations was 40% higher than in email.

    Also: vishing simulation, smishing simulation, QR simulation, quishing simulation, voice phishing test

    Full entry: Multichannel simulation

N

  • HRM-GOV-08Governance

    One of four NIST CSF 2.0 tiers, Partial, Risk Informed, Repeatable and Adaptive, that characterize the rigor of an organization's cybersecurity risk governance and management practices. NIST states that tiers are not maturity levels.

    Also: CSF tier, CSF implementation tier

    Full entry: NIST CSF tier
  • HRM-INT-14Interventions

    A timed test of whether people report a suspicious event through the approved channel and how fast the report reaches the responders.

    Also: reporting drill, escalation drill

    Full entry: Notification drill
  • HRM-INT-08Interventions

    A short, targeted message that reinforces one security behavior at the moment it matters, sent through chat, email or the browser. Nudges are counted; their effect is read in the behavior that follows.

    Also: behavioral nudge, policy nudge, prompt

    Full entry: Nudge

P

  • HRM-MEAS-19Measurement

    The share of people who say security controls get in the way of their work, measured by pulse survey. It is read beside policy exceptions and shadow IT measures.

    Also: friction rate, control friction

    Full entry: Perceived friction rate
  • HRM-GOV-03Governance

    The rules for storing, showing and acting on risk data about named people: who may see a person's score, how long signals are kept, what managers see and what is shown only in aggregate.

    Also: individual data governance, risk data governance, scoring governance

    Full entry: Person-level data governance
  • HRM-INT-05Interventions

    A controlled, consented lure sent to the workforce to observe who clicks, submits, opens and reports. Results are signals per person; the channel (email, SMS, voice, QR, video) is an attribute of each simulation.

    Also: simulated phishing, phishing test, simulation

    Full entry: Phishing simulation
  • HRM-MEAS-08Measurement

    The share of the workforce whose primary sign-in uses a phishing-resistant factor such as a FIDO2 key or a platform passkey. Privileged accounts are reported separately.

    Also: strong MFA coverage, passkey adoption, FIDO2 coverage

    Full entry: Phishing-resistant MFA coverage
  • HRM-INT-18Interventions

    A versioned definition of an automated intervention: the trigger signals or cohorts, the audience and the ordered actions. A playbook run is the unit of automated response the program counts.

    Also: workflow, automation, orchestration rule

    Full entry: Playbook
  • HRM-INT-12Interventions

    A recorded confirmation that a person has read a security policy or a topic-specific policy, refreshed when the policy changes. It is an organization-level readiness signal.

    Also: policy attestation, acceptable use acknowledgment

    Full entry: Policy acknowledgment
  • HRM-GOV-11Governance

    An approved, time-bound departure from a security policy for a named person or system, with a reason and an end date. Exceptions past expiry and exception holders who click are readiness signals.

    Also: waiver, policy waiver, exemption

    Full entry: Policy exception
  • HRM-MEAS-22Measurement

    The weighted mean of a practice’s answered assessment questions on a 1.0 to 5.0 scale. The overall score is the weighted mean of the six practices, and the overall level is at most one level above the weakest practice.

    Also: capability score, area score

    Full entry: Practice score

R

  • HRM-INT-22Interventions

    A visible acknowledgment of vigilant behavior: a thank-you for a report, a team leaderboard, a champion badge. Recognition reinforces the behavior it names.

    Also: positive reinforcement, reward

    Full entry: Recognition
  • HRM-MEAS-05Measurement

    A person with three or more simulation clicks in 180 days. The repeat clicker rate is the share of the workforce that meets this rule.

    Also: serial clicker, chronic clicker, repeat offender

    Full entry: Repeat clicker
  • HRM-MEAS-02Measurement

    The share of delivered simulations that were reported through the approved channel. For real phishing, the share of targeted people who reported.

    Also: reporting rate, phish report rate

    Full entry: Report rate
  • HRM-MEAS-03Measurement

    Reports divided by clicks across the same simulations in a period. Count every report of a simulated lure, divide by every click on one. A ratio above 1 means more reports than clicks.

    Also: report/click ratio, reports per click

    Full entry: Report-to-click ratio
  • HRM-MEAS-04Measurement

    People who reported a simulation divided by people who failed it, per simulation. Two other formulas circulate: engagement divided by failure, and reports divided by failures. The taxonomy uses reporters over failers and prints the formula beside the number.

    Also: report-to-fail ratio, resilience rate

    Full entry: Resilience ratio
  • HRM-CORE-07Core concepts

    The amount of human risk leadership agrees to accept, written as thresholds on key risk indicators. A program at the Preempt level reports whether each indicator sits inside its threshold.

    Also: risk tolerance, tolerance threshold

    Full entry: Risk appetite
  • HRM-GOV-05Governance

    The line in the enterprise risk register that names human risk, its owner, its key risk indicators, current and target levels and the controls that treat it.

    Also: enterprise risk entry, register line

    Full entry: Risk register entry
  • HRM-CORE-08Core concepts

    An observed action or omission that raises a person's exposure to a breach scenario: clicking a lure, reusing a password, moving data in bulk, disabling protection. Risky behavior signals carry the polarity 'risky'.

    Also: insecure behavior, unsafe behavior, risky action, risky behaviour

    Full entry: Risky behavior
  • HRM-CON-04Constructs

    A cohort class built from two or more risky Behavior signals with no Threat or Access condition: people whose own repeated actions mark them out.

    Also: high-risk users, riskiest users, risk concentration

    Full entry: Risky cohort
  • HRM-INT-03Interventions

    Training scoped to a defined work role and the risks that role carries: payment approvers, administrators, help-desk staff, developers. It starts by naming the roles and the people in them.

    Also: role-specific training, specialized training

    Full entry: Role-based training

S

  • HRM-CORE-10Core concepts

    A person's ability to recognize and avoid behaviors that could compromise cybersecurity and to act wisely and cautiously (NIST SP 800-50r1). Awareness is one input to human risk; a program that builds it is an awareness program.

    Also: awareness, cyber hygiene, security literacy

    Full entry: Security awareness
  • HRM-INT-11Interventions

    A network of volunteers across teams who model secure behavior, relay questions to the security team and localize guidance. Membership, activity and reach are program metrics.

    Also: security ambassador program, ambassadors, evangelists, champions network

    Full entry: Security champions program
  • HRM-MEAS-18Measurement

    A net promoter score for the security team: the share of the workforce who would recommend working with security minus the share who would not, measured by pulse survey.

    Also: security net promoter score, security team NPS

    Full entry: Security NPS
  • HRM-TECH-08Technology

    The cloud service that inspects web, SaaS and data traffic: web filtering, cloud access security broker and data loss prevention. It supplies shadow SaaS, shadow AI, OAuth and data movement telemetry.

    Also: SSE, CASB, web proxy, SASE, DLP

    Full entry: Security service edge
  • HRM-CON-06Constructs

    An ordered run of signals on one person across attack tactics inside a time window, from first contact to compromise evidence. A completed sequence moves the person to Stage 4 Suspected.

    Also: attack sequence

    Full entry: Sequence
  • HRM-TECH-10Technology

    The security information and event management system, with its orchestration and ticketing, where incidents are opened, attributed and closed. It supplies the Confirmed stage and the incident data behind incident lift.

    Also: security information and event management, SOAR, incident management

    Full entry: SIEM
  • HRM-MEAS-14Measurement

    The median time from a signal firing to the first intervention acting on it. It measures the program’s operating speed; the Orchestrate level expects it under 24 hours.

    Also: time to action, response latency, mean time to intervene

    Full entry: Signal-to-action time
  • HRM-GOV-07Governance

    A table that maps each risk domain, signal and maturity level to NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATT&CK, CIS Controls v8.1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and CMMC 2.0, so a program can report in the language its auditor already uses.

    Also: crosswalk, control mapping, framework alignment, lens

    Full entry: Standards crosswalk
  • HRM-INT-16Interventions

    A response that raises the authentication requirement for a person or session, such as requiring a phishing-resistant factor, because a risk signal fired.

    Also: MFA step-up, risk-based authentication, forced re-authentication

    Full entry: Step-up authentication

T

  • HRM-INT-13Interventions

    A facilitated walk-through of an incident scenario with the people who would respond, used to test decisions and hand-offs without touching systems.

    Also: scenario exercise, response rehearsal

    Full entry: Tabletop exercise
  • HRM-INT-20Interventions

    A time-boxed set of interventions aimed at one cohort or risk domain, with a stated metric and a before-and-after reading.

    Also: targeted intervention, focused campaign

    Full entry: Targeted campaign
  • HRM-CON-01Constructs

    A cohort class that joins a risky Behavior signal with a Threat signal on the same person: someone attackers already reach who also shows the behavior the attack needs.

    Also: B+T cohort, targeted people, highly targeted people

    Full entry: Targeted cohort
  • HRM-TECH-04Technology

    The raw events a source emits about a subject: a login, a click, a block, a grant, a survey answer. Signals are computed from telemetry; telemetry itself is kept to the retention the data governance sets.

    Also: events, event data, source events

    Full entry: Telemetry
  • HRM-GOV-13Governance

    The risk that a vendor, partner or their software exposes the organization. It is a sibling discipline; the taxonomy keeps the person-side signals, such as vendor-exposed people and risky OAuth grants, in the Web, cloud and SaaS domain.

    Also: supply chain risk, vendor risk, supplier risk

    Full entry: Third-party risk
  • HRM-CORE-04Core concepts

    The risk model behind the taxonomy. Threat is what reaches a person, Access is what the person could expose, Behavior is what the person does. Risk rises with the product of the three; vigilant behavior lowers it.

    Also: T×A×B, three dimensions, risk-factor model, threat, vulnerability, privilege

    Full entry: Threat × Access × Behavior model
  • HRM-MEAS-06Measurement

    The median time from an event to the first report of it. For simulations it is measured in minutes from delivery; for real incidents, in hours from the event.

    Also: time to first report, reporting latency, mean time to report

    Full entry: Time to report
  • HRM-MEAS-07Measurement

    The share of people in a scope who have completed the training their role requires inside its validity period. Role-based training currency covers sensitive roles.

    Also: training completion, completion rate, currency

    Full entry: Training currency

V

  • HRM-CORE-09Core concepts

    An observed action that lowers a person's exposure: reporting a phish, declining a suspicious request, enrolling phishing-resistant MFA, asking security before building. Vigilant behavior signals carry the polarity 'vigilant' and step a person back one stage.

    Also: secure behavior, protective behavior, positive behavior, vigilant behaviour

    Full entry: Vigilant behavior
  • HRM-CON-05Constructs

    A cohort class built from vigilant Behavior signals: people who report, decline and enroll strong controls. The program recognizes them and uses them as sensors and champions.

    Also: human sensors, reporters

    Full entry: Vigilant cohort
  • HRM-MEAS-09Measurement

    A risk domain that no connected source measures today. It is shown as a gap, never as a failing grade, and the roadmap schedules the integration that closes it.

    Also: blind spot, unmeasured domain, coverage gap

    Full entry: Visibility gap

W

  • HRM-CORE-06Core concepts

    Every identity that acts on an organization's systems and data: employees, contractors and AI agents. Each is a subject that can carry threat, access and behavior signals.

    Also: hybrid workforce, blended workforce, personnel, people and agents

    Full entry: Workforce

The initial assessment

Find your level.Then fix what matters.

18 questions, about 4 minutes and nothing to type before the result: your level, a score for each practice and three first playbooks, each Easy, Medium or Hard.

Suggest a change

What kind of change?

Only if you would like a reply. See the privacy notice.

Feedback
Start the assessment