PlanHRM Maturity Model 2.0
A 90-day roadmap,71 playbooks.
Find your level, start with the quick wins, then follow the roadmap. A playbook is a defined action with an owner, a week window inside the 90 days and the measure that proves it worked. 18 questions, about 4 minutes, and the initial assessment picks your first ones.
- 31 Easy, the quick wins
- 29 Medium
- 11 Hard
Three steps
- 01 · Assess
Start the assessment.
18 questions across the six practices of the maturity model. About 4 minutes, and you see the result before you type anything.
Start the assessment - 02 · Place
Find your level.
The result places your program on the HRM Maturity Model, aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers, with a score for each practice.
- 1Comply NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 1 · Partial
- 2Observe NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 2 · Risk Informed
- 3Prioritize NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 3 · Repeatable
- 4Orchestrate NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 4 · Adaptive
- 5Preempt NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Beyond Tier 4
- 03 · Act
Start with the quick wins.
Your result lists three first playbooks and a 90-day roadmap for your level. A quick win is an Easy playbook: 31 of the 71 playbooks are Easy.
See the quick wins by level
Quick wins
The Easy playbooks at each level.
Find your level with the assessment, then open it here. Each playbook has an owner, a week window inside the 90 days and the measure that proves it worked.
Level 1 Comply NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 1 · Partial 7 quick wins
The program meets the training requirement and counts activity: training completion and simulation clicks.
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count reported simulations per person Add report-button data to the program export and count reports per person next to clicks. Reporting is the first vigilant behavior and it costs nothing to collect. | See | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Report rate per person and per team |
List repeat clickers by name Pull people with three or more clicks in 180 days from the simulation platform. The list is the first cohort the program can act on. | Understand | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Repeat clickers as a share of the workforce |
Send a nudge inside 24 hours of a simulation click Replace the remedial module with a short nudge delivered the same day. Timing changes behavior more than length does. | Act | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Median hours from click to nudge |
Publish the report-to-click ratio Report reports divided by clicks per simulation, next to completion. The ratio is the first number that shows vigilance. | Prove | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Report-to-click ratio |
Write a one-page program charter Name the owner, scope, partners, reporting cadence and the decisions the program can make. A charter is the first governance artifact anyone will ask for. | Govern | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Charter signed by the CISO |
Count reports of suspicious activity each month Count every report from the button, the help desk and email, and publish the number. What gets counted gets noticed. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Reports per 100 people per month |
Ask email security for the monthly targeting report Request a monthly export of who received real phishing and impersonation attempts. It shows which people attackers pick before any connector exists. | See | SOC | 2–4 | EasyQuick win | Targeted people listed by name each month |
Level 2 Observe NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 2 · Risk Informed 6 quick wins
The program observes behavior across several risk domains and knows who reports.
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pull MFA enrollment per person from the identity provider Export the MFA method per person and join it to the behavior scorecard. Weak MFA is the access signal that turns a click into a takeover. | See | Identity team | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Share of the workforce on phishing-resistant MFA |
Define three two-signal cohorts Name cohorts that combine signals: targeted people who click, risky people with payment authority, and non-reporters in finance. A cohort is a population you can count and act on. | Understand | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Cohorts defined, counted and trended |
Write the first three playbooks Document trigger, audience, action, owner and time limit for repeat clickers, weak-MFA privileged users and leavers. A written playbook is what gets automated later. | Act | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Playbooks written with an owner and a time limit |
Set a target for each cohort and report against it Agree with the CISO a target size for repeat clickers and weak-MFA privileged users and show progress each quarter. A number with no target is trivia. | Prove | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Cohorts reported against a target |
Give every policy exception an expiry date Record exceptions in the ticket system with an end date and an owner. An expired exception is risk with no owner. | Govern | GRC lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Exceptions past expiry |
Run a three-question culture pulse Ask security NPS, perceived friction and confidence each quarter. Three questions get answered every quarter. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Pulse participation |
Level 3 Prioritize NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 3 · Repeatable 6 quick wins
Threat, access and behavior are joined per person, and the riskiest cohorts are ranked and targeted first.
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Set a dwell window and a staleness flag per signal Give each signal a window (threat 90 days, simulated behavior 180 days, real interaction 30 days) and flag any source silent for seven days. Stale signals put people at the wrong stage. | See | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Share of signals with a window and a freshness flag |
Compute a stage per person from active signals Place each person on the road from Clear to Confirmed by the furthest active signal. One number per person makes the cohort review fast. | Understand | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Stage 3+ people per priority breach scenario |
Measure time from signal to action per playbook Timestamp each trigger and each completed action, and publish the median per playbook. The median is the number that proves playbooks run. | Act | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Median time from signal to action |
Compute training hours saved by targeting Compare hours delivered under the targeted schedule with the old whole-workforce schedule. Saved hours is a number the CFO reads. | Prove | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Training hours saved per quarter |
Require a named human owner for every AI agent Add owner, scope and retirement date as required fields for any agent or service identity. Ownership is the base of agent governance. | Govern | Identity team | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Agents with no owner |
Measure the confidence-ability gap Compare self-rated ability from the pulse with simulation results per team. Overconfident teams are the coaching target. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Confidence-ability gap in points |
Level 4 Orchestrate NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Tier 4 · Adaptive 6 quick wins
Playbooks orchestrate controls across the stack as risk changes, and the program proves its lift.
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure AI tool use and personal-account logins Use web and SaaS logs to count AI tool use per person, split by corporate and personal accounts. Shadow AI share is the first AI use signal and it needs no new tool. | See | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Shadow AI share by team |
Write a reversal rule for every automated action State who can reverse each automated action, how, and inside what time. Reversal is what makes automation acceptable to IT and HR. | Act | CISO | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Automated actions with a documented reversal |
File a privacy review for each automated action Record the lawful basis, the data used and the works-council or employee notice for each automated action. The file keeps automation running when HR or legal asks. | Govern | HR business partner | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Automated actions with a privacy review on file |
Publish role-based AI guidance for three teams Write one page each for developers, finance and customer-facing teams on which AI use is sanctioned and how to check an output. Role guidance gets read; a generic policy gets filed. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Share who check AI output before use |
Retire cohorts with no lift Drop cohorts and sequences with no measured lift after two quarters and record why. Fewer, proven patterns keep the SOC’s attention. | Understand | CISO | 2–4 | EasyQuick win | Cohorts retired or re-scoped each quarter |
Draft five board KRIs with thresholds Pick five numbers (stage 3+ share, time to action, report rate, phishing-resistant MFA, agents with owners) and propose a threshold for each. The draft starts the risk appetite conversation. | Prove | CISO | 2–4 | EasyQuick win | KRIs with approved thresholds |
Level 5 Preempt NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tier: Beyond Tier 4 6 quick wins
AI predicts which attack sequences are forming, and the program acts before the next step, at machine speed, for people and AI agents on one risk model.
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Publish the visibility-gap list with target dates List every signal no source measures and give each a target date and an owner. A gap is risk nobody can see, and a dated list keeps it on the agenda. | See | CISO | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Open visibility gaps with a dated owner |
Agree a loss range per priority breach scenario with finance Set a loss range per breach scenario with finance and a risk appetite threshold with the board owner. The ranges turn stage counts into money the board can govern. | Understand | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Priority breach scenarios with an agreed loss range |
Review reversal and false-positive rates each quarter Count reversed actions and complaints per playbook and tune the thresholds. Automation that annoys people loses its mandate. | Act | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Reversal rate per playbook |
Have internal audit review the measurement method Hand the method, data lineage and model change log to internal audit. Independent review keeps the board’s trust in the numbers. | Prove | GRC lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Open audit findings on the method |
Name the board owner of the human risk KRIs Agree which board member or committee reviews the KRIs each quarter and record it in the committee’s terms of reference. A named owner makes the KRIs real. | Govern | CISO | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Board reviews held per year |
Report executives their own security behaviors Show each executive their MFA, reporting and simulation results each quarter. Leaders change what they can see. | Culture | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Executives above target on their own behaviors |
How the roadmap is built
From your result to a 90-day plan.
The result of the initial assessment carries the plan: three first playbooks and a 90-day roadmap. The same four rules build it for every program.
- 01
Every practice counts
Each of the six practices contributes the playbooks written for its current level.
- 02
Weakest first
Playbooks for the weakest practices come first, so every practice is represented before any gets a second.
- 03
Easy before Hard
Inside a practice, Easy playbooks come before Medium and Medium before Hard.
- 04
Eight at most
The plan stops at eight playbooks and lays them out over three months by each one’s week window.
Every playbook
By the level they start from.
A program at a level runs that level’s playbooks to reach the next one. Level 5 playbooks hold the level.
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count reported simulations per person Add report-button data to the program export and count reports per person next to clicks. Reporting is the first vigilant behavior and it costs nothing to collect. | See | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Report rate per person and per team |
List repeat clickers by name Pull people with three or more clicks in 180 days from the simulation platform. The list is the first cohort the program can act on. | Understand | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Repeat clickers as a share of the workforce |
Send a nudge inside 24 hours of a simulation click Replace the remedial module with a short nudge delivered the same day. Timing changes behavior more than length does. | Act | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Median hours from click to nudge |
Publish the report-to-click ratio Report reports divided by clicks per simulation, next to completion. The ratio is the first number that shows vigilance. | Prove | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Report-to-click ratio |
Write a one-page program charter Name the owner, scope, partners, reporting cadence and the decisions the program can make. A charter is the first governance artifact anyone will ask for. | Govern | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Charter signed by the CISO |
Count reports of suspicious activity each month Count every report from the button, the help desk and email, and publish the number. What gets counted gets noticed. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Reports per 100 people per month |
Ask email security for the monthly targeting report Request a monthly export of who received real phishing and impersonation attempts. It shows which people attackers pick before any connector exists. | See | SOC | 2–4 | EasyQuick win | Targeted people listed by name each month |
Inventory every data source and its refresh date List each number the program reports, its source, its owner and the date it was last refreshed. The list is the baseline the next three levels build on. | See | Security awareness lead | 5–8 | Medium | Sources listed with owner and refresh date |
Ask the SOC for last year’s human-related incidents Get the count of incidents by type where a person’s action was a step, over the last 12 months. The count ranks which breach scenarios matter in this organization. | Understand | SOC | 5–8 | Medium | Incidents by breach scenario for the last 12 months |
Agree a manual MFA reset path with the identity team Write the steps the program follows when a person is confirmed compromised: who requests, who resets, inside what time. The first control change starts as a documented manual request. | Act | Identity team | 5–8 | Medium | Confirmed compromises with MFA reset inside the agreed time |
Send a one-page quarterly report to the CISO Put four numbers, one trend and one decision needed on a page each quarter. The reporting habit creates the demand for better numbers. | Prove | Security awareness lead | 5–8 | Medium | Quarterly reports delivered on time |
Publish an AI acceptable-use policy State which tools are sanctioned, what data may never enter a prompt, and how to request a new tool. A policy makes shadow AI measurable. | Govern | GRC lead | 5–8 | Medium | Share of the workforce that acknowledged the policy |
Open a help-before-you-build channel Give people one place to ask security a question and log each request. Requests are the first culture signal a program can count. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 5–8 | Medium | Requests to security per 100 people per quarter |
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pull MFA enrollment per person from the identity provider Export the MFA method per person and join it to the behavior scorecard. Weak MFA is the access signal that turns a click into a takeover. | See | Identity team | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Share of the workforce on phishing-resistant MFA |
Define three two-signal cohorts Name cohorts that combine signals: targeted people who click, risky people with payment authority, and non-reporters in finance. A cohort is a population you can count and act on. | Understand | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Cohorts defined, counted and trended |
Write the first three playbooks Document trigger, audience, action, owner and time limit for repeat clickers, weak-MFA privileged users and leavers. A written playbook is what gets automated later. | Act | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Playbooks written with an owner and a time limit |
Set a target for each cohort and report against it Agree with the CISO a target size for repeat clickers and weak-MFA privileged users and show progress each quarter. A number with no target is trivia. | Prove | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Cohorts reported against a target |
Give every policy exception an expiry date Record exceptions in the ticket system with an end date and an owner. An expired exception is risk with no owner. | Govern | GRC lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Exceptions past expiry |
Run a three-question culture pulse Ask security NPS, perceived friction and confidence each quarter. Three questions get answered every quarter. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Pulse participation |
Use the HR system as the person identifier Map every source to the HR employee identifier so each person has one record. Every later join depends on this spine. | See | HR business partner | 5–9 | Medium | Share of records matched to one HR identifier |
Rank breach scenarios by your own incidents Score the ten breach scenarios by last year’s incident counts and losses, and publish the top three. Priorities set from your own data survive a budget review. | Understand | CISO | 5–8 | Medium | Breach scenarios ranked with incident counts |
Start a monthly incident review with the SOC Review every human-related incident of the month and record which signal could have shown it earlier. Each review adds one candidate cohort or sequence. | Understand | SOC | 5–7 | Medium | Reviews held with candidate patterns recorded |
Target repeat clickers and the Critical cohort Aim simulations and coaching at people who are targeted, click and hold sensitive access, and shrink the whole-workforce schedule. Effort goes where risk concentrates. | Act | Security awareness lead | 5–9 | Medium | Critical cohort as a share of the workforce |
Report stage 3+ people per priority breach scenario Add the count and trend of people at stage 3 or above for each priority breach scenario. The count links the program to breach scenarios. | Prove | Security awareness lead | 5–9 | Medium | Stage 3+ count per breach scenario with trend |
Start a monthly review with the SOC, IT and HR Review cohorts, decisions and blocked actions with minutes. Decisions need the partners in the room who can carry them out. | Govern | CISO | 5–9 | Medium | Reviews held with recorded decisions |
Stand up security champions in each business unit Name a champion per unit, give them a monthly brief and a channel to security. Champions carry the program where email cannot. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 5–10 | Medium | Business units with an active champion |
Recognize people who report real phishing Thank reporters the same day and name the top reporting teams each month. Recognition raises the report rate faster than reminders do. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 5–8 | Medium | Report rate above click rate |
Add voice, SMS and QR lures to the simulation mix Run simulations on the channels attackers use beyond email. Per-channel results show where people are untested. | Act | Security awareness lead | 6–11 | Medium | Click rate per channel |
Map program metrics to the control framework Tie each reported metric to a NIST CSF 2.0 outcome or to the framework the organization follows. The map lets GRC and audit reuse the program’s numbers. | Prove | GRC lead | 6–10 | Medium | Metrics mapped to framework outcomes |
Join real phishing telemetry to simulation results Connect email security so delivered and reported real phish sit per person next to simulation results. The join shows the report rate against real attacks. | See | SOC | 5–12 | Hard | Real-phishing report rate among targeted people |
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Set a dwell window and a staleness flag per signal Give each signal a window (threat 90 days, simulated behavior 180 days, real interaction 30 days) and flag any source silent for seven days. Stale signals put people at the wrong stage. | See | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Share of signals with a window and a freshness flag |
Compute a stage per person from active signals Place each person on the road from Clear to Confirmed by the furthest active signal. One number per person makes the cohort review fast. | Understand | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Stage 3+ people per priority breach scenario |
Measure time from signal to action per playbook Timestamp each trigger and each completed action, and publish the median per playbook. The median is the number that proves playbooks run. | Act | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Median time from signal to action |
Compute training hours saved by targeting Compare hours delivered under the targeted schedule with the old whole-workforce schedule. Saved hours is a number the CFO reads. | Prove | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Training hours saved per quarter |
Require a named human owner for every AI agent Add owner, scope and retirement date as required fields for any agent or service identity. Ownership is the base of agent governance. | Govern | Identity team | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Agents with no owner |
Measure the confidence-ability gap Compare self-rated ability from the pulse with simulation results per team. Overconfident teams are the coaching target. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Confidence-ability gap in points |
Give the review decision rights over controls Agree in writing which MFA, access and DLP changes the program may trigger and which need IT or HR sign-off. Decision rights turn playbooks into action. | Govern | CISO | 5–10 | Medium | Control changes approved in the forum |
Join pulse results to behavior per team Put friction and NPS next to reporting and click rates for each team. Teams with high friction and low reporting are where culture work goes first. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 5–9 | Medium | Teams with high friction and low reporting |
Connect breach-exposure data for leaked credentials Feed leaked-credential and dark-web exposure per person into the record and open a ticket for each new hit. An exposed credential is a threat signal with a deadline. | See | Identity team | 6–10 | Medium | Exposed credentials resolved inside the target window |
Add AI use and AI agent cohorts Define cohorts for sensitive data in prompts, personal-account AI use, and agents with broad scopes and no logging. AI risk needs the same cohort logic as people. | Understand | GRC lead | 6–10 | Medium | AI cohorts counted next to people cohorts |
Add a playbook for sensitive data in AI prompts Trigger coaching and a policy reminder when inspection finds sensitive data in a prompt, and route repeats to the manager. AI use needs a response path like any other risky behavior. | Act | GRC lead | 6–10 | Medium | Sensitive-prompt incidents per 100 people per quarter |
Connect endpoint protection to the person record Bring tampering, malware and patch events in and attribute each one to the device owner. Endpoint is the fourth domain and the first step of the ransomware sequence. | See | SOC | 5–13 | Hard | Endpoint signals attributed to a named owner |
Define sequences for the top three breach scenarios Write ordered signal sequences with windows, for example phish delivered, link clicked, unusual sign-in, new MFA device inside 72 hours. A completed sequence is the earliest incident warning you have. | Understand | SOC | 5–13 | Hard | Sequences defined and firing inside their windows |
Automate the two highest-volume playbooks Connect trigger to action for the two playbooks with the most runs, for example step-up MFA for stage 3 people and an access review for leavers. Automation removes the queue between signal and action. | Act | Identity team | 5–13 | Hard | Share of playbook runs completed with no manual step |
Report incident lift and avoided incidents Publish lift per pattern and the incidents avoided where sequences were interrupted. Avoided incidents is the proof of risk reduction. | Prove | SOC | 5–13 | Hard | Avoided incidents per quarter |
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure AI tool use and personal-account logins Use web and SaaS logs to count AI tool use per person, split by corporate and personal accounts. Shadow AI share is the first AI use signal and it needs no new tool. | See | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Shadow AI share by team |
Write a reversal rule for every automated action State who can reverse each automated action, how, and inside what time. Reversal is what makes automation acceptable to IT and HR. | Act | CISO | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Automated actions with a documented reversal |
File a privacy review for each automated action Record the lawful basis, the data used and the works-council or employee notice for each automated action. The file keeps automation running when HR or legal asks. | Govern | HR business partner | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Automated actions with a privacy review on file |
Publish role-based AI guidance for three teams Write one page each for developers, finance and customer-facing teams on which AI use is sanctioned and how to check an output. Role guidance gets read; a generic policy gets filed. | Culture | Security awareness lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Share who check AI output before use |
Retire cohorts with no lift Drop cohorts and sequences with no measured lift after two quarters and record why. Fewer, proven patterns keep the SOC’s attention. | Understand | CISO | 2–4 | EasyQuick win | Cohorts retired or re-scoped each quarter |
Draft five board KRIs with thresholds Pick five numbers (stage 3+ share, time to action, report rate, phishing-resistant MFA, agents with owners) and propose a threshold for each. The draft starts the risk appetite conversation. | Prove | CISO | 2–4 | EasyQuick win | KRIs with approved thresholds |
Inventory AI agents and service identities with owners List every agent and service identity, its human owner and its scopes from the entitlement system. An agent with no owner cannot be governed or paused. | See | Identity team | 5–9 | Medium | Share of agents with a current named owner |
Measure incident lift per cohort and sequence Compare the incident rate inside each cohort with the rest of the workforce over 12 months. Lift proves which patterns matter here and which are folklore. | Understand | SOC | 5–9 | Medium | Incident lift for the top five patterns |
Estimate avoided loss with a method finance agreed Multiply avoided incidents by the loss range per breach scenario and publish the method with the number. An agreed method beats a big number. | Prove | CISO | 5–10 | Medium | Avoided loss per quarter with the method published |
Write the human risk appetite statement State the tolerated level per KRI and the escalation when it is crossed. Risk appetite is what the board can govern. | Govern | CISO | 5–9 | Medium | KRIs with an approved threshold |
Co-create the next policy with employee feedback Draft the policy with champions, run it past the teams it affects and record the changes. People follow policies they helped shape. | Culture | GRC lead | 5–10 | Medium | Policies co-created with feedback |
Pause out-of-scope AI agents by playbook Alert on agent actions outside the declared scope, pause the agent and notify its owner. A runaway agent needs the same response speed as a compromised account. | Act | SOC | 6–11 | Medium | Out-of-scope agent actions paused inside the target window |
Interrupt the phish-to-takeover sequence at step three Trigger step-up MFA and session revocation when a sequence reaches the unusual sign-in step. The sequence ends before persistence. | Act | Identity team | 5–13 | Hard | Sequences interrupted before the final step |
Move the top sources to daily feeds Replace monthly extracts from the top five sources with daily feeds through the SIEM or an API. A sequence with a 72-hour window is invisible in monthly data. | See | SOC | 6–13 | Hard | Median signal age in hours |
| Playbook | Practice | Owner | Weeks | Difficulty | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Publish the visibility-gap list with target dates List every signal no source measures and give each a target date and an owner. A gap is risk nobody can see, and a dated list keeps it on the agenda. | See | CISO | 1–2 | EasyQuick win | Open visibility gaps with a dated owner |
Agree a loss range per priority breach scenario with finance Set a loss range per breach scenario with finance and a risk appetite threshold with the board owner. The ranges turn stage counts into money the board can govern. | Understand | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Priority breach scenarios with an agreed loss range |
Review reversal and false-positive rates each quarter Count reversed actions and complaints per playbook and tune the thresholds. Automation that annoys people loses its mandate. | Act | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Reversal rate per playbook |
Have internal audit review the measurement method Hand the method, data lineage and model change log to internal audit. Independent review keeps the board’s trust in the numbers. | Prove | GRC lead | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Open audit findings on the method |
Name the board owner of the human risk KRIs Agree which board member or committee reviews the KRIs each quarter and record it in the committee’s terms of reference. A named owner makes the KRIs real. | Govern | CISO | 1–3 | EasyQuick win | Board reviews held per year |
Report executives their own security behaviors Show each executive their MFA, reporting and simulation results each quarter. Leaders change what they can see. | Culture | CISO | 1–4 | EasyQuick win | Executives above target on their own behaviors |
Report human risk reduction over 6, 12 and 24 months Publish the index change over three horizons with the model version used. Long horizons show whether gains hold. | Prove | CISO | 5–9 | Medium | Risk reduction at 6, 12 and 24 months |
Report culture KRIs to the board inside appetite Add security NPS, perceived friction and time to report as board KRIs with thresholds. Culture becomes a risk measure the board reviews. | Culture | CISO | 5–9 | Medium | Culture KRIs inside their thresholds |
Put people, agents and vendors on one subject record Extend the person record so AI agents and vendor accounts carry the same threat, access and behavior fields. One model lets the SOC compare a runaway agent with a compromised person. | See | Identity team | 5–13 | Hard | Subjects of all four types on one record |
Forecast next quarter’s stage 3+ population Project the stage 3+ population per priority breach scenario from trend and planned actions, and record the forecast error each quarter. Forecast error is how the program learns whether its model works. | Understand | CISO | 5–13 | Hard | Forecast error per priority breach scenario |
Tie standing access to stage Let stage drive entitlement: stage 3+ people lose standing privilege inside the window set, and regain it when the stage drops. Access that follows risk closes the insider and takeover sequences. | Act | Identity team | 5–13 | Hard | Stage 3+ people with standing privilege removed inside the window |
Commission an annual independent review Have internal audit or a third party review the model, the automation and the privacy controls each year. Review is the price of automation at scale. | Govern | GRC lead | 5–13 | Hard | Findings closed inside the agreed window |
HRM Maturity Assessment
Which playbooks are yours?
An initial assessment: 18 questions, about 4 minutes. Your level, six practice scores and a 90-day roadmap, shown immediately.
- Questions
- 18
- Minutes, about
- 4