Incident Response Readiness
How effectively individuals report, escalate, and participate in incident response processes.
Indicators
An observed identity opens incidents lacking repro steps, time bounds, or artifacts, slowing triage and inflating MTTR.
An observed identity assigns incorrect severity or routes to the wrong resolver group, creating rework and detection delays.
An observed identity generates excessive or misclassified incident tickets, which contributes to alert fatigue, obscures true threats among noise, and reduces the efficiency of security operations teams.
An observed identity consistently misses signs of compromise or social engineering during testing or real events, highlighting gaps in security awareness that leave the organization vulnerable to preventable attacks.
An observed identity bypasses established incident reporting processes, ignoring required workflows or controls, which leads to inconsistent handling, lost context, and diminished organizational readiness against real threats.
An observed identity fails to coordinate effectively during incident response, neglecting collaboration, responsibility-sharing, or knowledge transfer, which weakens team resilience and slows down collective response.
An observed identity repeatedly misses deadlines for required security training or certifications, leaving critical knowledge gaps unaddressed and creating long-term risk to organizational resilience.
An observed identity circumvents training systems, such as skipping modules or finding shortcuts to mark content complete, resulting in minimal comprehension and a false sense of compliance with security requirements.
An observed identity superficially completes training modules with minimal interaction, indicating poor knowledge retention and leaving them ill-prepared to recognize or respond to real-world security threats.
An observed identity completes training that does not match their job responsibilities or access level, leaving gaps in coverage for critical risk areas and undermining the effectiveness of the organization’s overall training program.
An observed identity fails to acknowledge urgent alerts on time, extending dwell time and delaying coordinated response.
An observed identity opens redundant tickets for a single issue, fragmenting context and wasting analyst cycles.
An observed identity discusses sensitive incident details in open forums or DMs, risking data leakage and loss of evidentiary record.
An observed identity takes ad‑hoc response steps without recording rationale or timing, complicating forensics and PIR accuracy.
An observed identity provides IOCs without format or context, causing rule errors and wasted hunting time.
An observed identity alters or loses key artifacts (e.g., reimages host before imaging), degrading investigative fidelity.
An observed identity disables controls or delays patches without authorization, expanding the attack window during response.
An observed identity leaves remediation items open or overdue, allowing repeat incidents and audit findings.
An observed identity skips drills or participates passively, limiting readiness and weakening muscle memory.
An observed identity pastes credentials or patient data into unprotected notes, creating privacy and breach risk.
An observed identity overlooks notifiable events, increasing liability and contractual exposure.
An observed identity acknowledges high‑priority pages within defined SLAs, reducing time to triage and accelerating containment.
An observed identity routes critical incidents to the right team and severity on first pass, minimizing handoff latency.
An observed identity includes logs, screenshots, hashes, and timestamps that enable rapid reproduction and triage.
An observed identity links duplicate or related alerts into one case, improving signal‑to‑noise and analyst focus.
An observed identity coordinates in sanctioned war‑room channels with logging and retention, preserving auditability.
An observed identity records who did what and when (e.g., blocks, quarantines), enabling audit and rollback if needed.
An observed identity supplies normalized IOCs (hashes, IPs, domains) with context and dwell windows to drive detections.
An observed identity executes documented steps for the scenario, reducing variance and human error under pressure.
An observed identity collects and stores artifacts with integrity controls, enabling admissible investigation outcomes.
An observed identity seeks time‑bound exceptions (e.g., control bypass) through formal approval paths with rollback criteria.
An observed identity closes assigned PIR actions before due dates, preventing regression and strengthening controls.
An observed identity provides concise status, risks, and next steps, preventing stall during follow‑the‑sun operations.
An observed identity actively practices playbooks, surfaces gaps, and applies learnings to production response.
An observed identity stores secrets, PII/PHI, or regulated data in approved fields and vaults with retention controls.
An observed identity flags potential regulatory triggers (e.g., breach thresholds), enabling timely counsel engagement.
Relevance
The category captures frontline defense behaviors, including accurate ticketing, timely escalations, and participation in drills. It reveals readiness to detect, contain, and recover from threats.
Why this matters
Practitioners care because detection and containment speed determines breach impact. Strong human response readiness complements automated detection tools and reduces mean time to respond.
Consequences of neglect
If ignored, delays in detection, poor escalation, or lack of participation result in uncontrolled spread of threats, failed compliance obligations, and greater financial and reputational damage.